**We apologize for the delay in delivering this email, which was caused by a mail incident that occurred over the weekend on June 10th. This email was originally sent from marex@xxxxxxx on 06/11/2023 12:15:50 On 5/17/23 09:15, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 10.05.2023 20:19:38, Vincent Mailhol wrote: > [...] >> ISO 11898-1 is such a rabbit hole... sights... > > How do we proceed? > > I like Marek's approach of defining the delay first in the driver and > then moving it to a common header in the second patch to facilitate > backporting. > > Do we agree on the maximum number of bits to wait in the worst case? Is any further change expected from me to this patch ?
