[PATCH RESEND] can: j1939: do not wait 250ms if the same addr was already claimed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is not explicitly stated in SAE J1939-21 and some tools used for
ISO-11783 certification do not expect this wait.

Fixes: 9d71dd0 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Signed-off-by: Devid Antonio Filoni <devid.filoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/can/j1939/address-claim.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c b/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
index f33c47327927..1d070c08edf1 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
@@ -165,6 +165,12 @@ static void j1939_ac_process(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	 * leaving this function.
 	 */
 	ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_name_locked(priv, name);
+
+	if (ecu && ecu->addr == skcb->addr.sa) {
+		/* the address was already claimed with the same name, nothing to do */
+		goto out_ecu_put;
+	}
+
 	if (!ecu && j1939_address_is_unicast(skcb->addr.sa))
 		ecu = j1939_ecu_create_locked(priv, name);
 
-- 
2.25.1




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux