On 05.01.2022 09:25:35, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > Is the name "rx-fifo" acceptable? Can you think of a better name?
>
> If I am not mistaken this series arises from the need to deactivate
> the RxFIFO only if it is acceptable not to receive the notification of
> RTR messages. I wonder if this can be made explicit to the user.
>
> Do you think it makes sense to explicitly RTR ("rtr-notify") instead
> of RxFIFO (rx-fifo) ?
>
> And if it makes sense to make it clear that it occurs at the expense
> of a smaller number of messages allocated for reception?
>
> >
> > What about adding a new quirk to the driver, only if that quirk is
> > that, it is allowed to change between rx-fifo and rx-mailbox mode?
> >
>
> What platforms are you thinking of for this type of quirk to add?
Add this quirk for all platforms that currently don't use
FLEXCAN_QUIRK_USE_OFF_TIMESTAMP.
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
