On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:04:14 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> The spin_trylock() was assumed to contain the implicit
> barrier needed to ensure the correct ordering between
> STATE_MISSED setting/clearing and STATE_MISSED checking
> in commit a90c57f2cedd ("net: sched: fix packet stuck
> problem for lockless qdisc").
>
> But it turns out that spin_trylock() only has load-acquire
> semantic, for strongly-ordered system(like x86), the compiler
> barrier implicitly contained in spin_trylock() seems enough
> to ensure the correct ordering. But for weakly-orderly system
> (like arm64), the store-release semantic is needed to ensure
> the correct ordering as clear_bit() and test_bit() is store
> operation, see queued_spin_lock().
>
> So add the explicit barrier to ensure the correct ordering
> for the above case.
>
> Fixes: a90c57f2cedd ("net: sched: fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc")
> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
