Re: [net-next 6/6] can: mcp251xfd: mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(): work around broken CRC on TBC register

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09.05.2021 07:46:20, Patrick Menschel wrote:
> > Do I have to change my test?
> 
> I changed my test to 1 hour and removed the sleep statement.
> Still no measurable difference for performance and no CRC Errors with
> both kernels.

See other mail about my thoughts about performance and CRC.

> Apparently the test is hard on the CPU, I have two pytest processes
> listed in htop one with 80%CPU and one with 60% CPU, approx 30% ram
> usage of 512MB. I have no clue how it reaches the CPU values, there
> should be only one CPU on the pi0w.

Interesting :)

> ### 5.10.17+ on pi0w ###
> 
> 2021-05-09 08:02:56 [    INFO] 725649 frames in 1:00:00
> (test_socketcan.py:890)
> 
> ### 5.10.31-performance-backports+ on pi0w ###
> 
> 2021-05-09 09:13:32 [    INFO] 715936 frames in 1:00:00
> (test_socketcan.py:890)
> 
> I'll switch boards to a pi3b and test again with these settings.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux