On 06.05.2021 12:45:38, Sottas Guillaume (LMB) wrote: > Thank you for your investigations, seems to be the way to go? What is > the next step, could I help in any way or are you going to merge your > patch directly? I'm not really sure how we should go further in order > to inegrate your fix in the code... Maybe we can use sk->sk_err directly instead of adding a new variable. I've send a patch, please test. > Thank you in advance for your feedback, Thanks, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature