Hi, On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 at 14:27, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25.04.2021 14:22:12, Erik Flodin wrote: > > Before this fix, the function and userdata columns weren't aligned: > > device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident > > vcan0 92345678 9fffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0 raw > > vcan0 123 00000123 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0 raw > > > > After the fix they are: > > device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident > > vcan0 92345678 9fffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0 raw > > vcan0 123 00000123 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0 raw > > > > Signed-off-by: Erik Flodin <erik@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > net/can/proc.c | 7 +++++-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/can/proc.c b/net/can/proc.c > > index 5ea8695f507e..35b6c7512785 100644 > > --- a/net/can/proc.c > > +++ b/net/can/proc.c > > @@ -205,8 +205,11 @@ static void can_print_recv_banner(struct seq_file *m) > > * can1. 00000000 00000000 00000000 > > * ....... 0 tp20 > > */ > > - seq_puts(m, " device can_id can_mask function" > > - " userdata matches ident\n"); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > + seq_puts(m, " device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident\n"); > > +#else > > + seq_puts(m, " device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident\n"); > > +#endif > > Please use "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))" as in your example in your > previous mail. Ok. I've sent a new patch, but of course I forgot to add -v4. Sorry about that. // Erik
