Re: [PATCH] can: uapi: can.h: mark union inside struct can_frame packed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22.03.2021 17:27:38, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22.03.21 11:28, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > In commit ea7800565a12 ("can: add optional DLC element to Classical
> > CAN frame structure") the struct can_frame::can_dlc was put into an
> > anonymous union with another u8 variable.
> > 
> > For various reasons some members in struct can_frame and canfd_frame
> > including the first 8 byes of data are expected to have the same
> > memory layout. This is enforced by a BUILD_BUG_ON check in af_can.c.
> > 
> > Since the above mentioned commit this check fails on at least one compiler
> > (arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0). Rong Chen analyzed the problem
> > and found that the union in struct can_frame takes 4 bytes instead of
> > the expected 1:
> > 
> > | struct can_frame {
> > |          canid_t                    can_id;               /* 0     4 */
> > |          union {
> > |                  __u8               len;                  /* 4     1 */
> > |                  __u8               can_dlc;              /* 4     1 */
> > |          };                                               /* 4     4 */
> > |          __u8                       __pad;                /* 8     1 */
> > |          __u8                       __res0;               /* 9     1 */
> > |          __u8                       len8_dlc;             /* 10     1 */
> > |
> > |          /* XXX 5 bytes hole, try to pack */
> > |
> > |          __u8                       data[8]
> > | __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /*    16     8 */
> > |
> > |          /* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */
> > |          /* sum members: 19, holes: 1, sum holes: 5 */
> > |          /* forced alignments: 1, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 5 */
> > |          /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
> > | } __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
> > 
> > Marking the union as packed fixes the problem.
> 
> Is this a proper answer to this issue?

With the affected compiler, yes. This patch makes the union 1 byte long,
as expected. This effectively fixes compiling.

I'm glad that the build bug triggered, which avoids having a broken
running kernel.

> Shouldn't this problem cause the developer to update the compiler?

The question is, are the other silent corruptions with a similar union
somewhere? Maybe we should escalate this problem to the linux-arm-kernel
ML.

Rong Chen, can I download the compiler you're using somewhere?

> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/f8075a19-10e1-abf9-6d59-1a46454b74b1@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux