On Wed. 13 Jan 2021 at 00:49, Jimmy Assarsson <extja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2021-01-12 16:22, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > On 1/12/21 4:11 PM, Vincent MAILHOL wrote: > >> On Tue. 12 Jan 2021 at 22:05, Vincent Mailhol > >> <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> This driver supports the ES581.4, ES582.1 and ES584.1 interfaces from > >>> ETAS GmbH (https://www.etas.com/en/products/es58x.php). > >>> > >>> Co-developed-by: Arunachalam Santhanam <arunachalam.santhanam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: Arunachalam Santhanam <arunachalam.santhanam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> > >> > >> Something strange is going on with the mailing list. I can not > >> see the second patch (1/1) in the *linux-can* mailing > >> archive (only the cover letter is present): > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20210112130538.14912-1-mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx/T/# > >> > >> However, the full patch series is present on the *netdev* mailing > >> archives: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210112130538.14912-2-mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx/ > >> > >> Are there any restrictions in regard to the patch size on the > >> linux-can mailing list? > > > > Not to my knowledge. > > I remember having issues posting a large patch. > > You probably hit this limit: > "Message size exceeding 100 000 characters causes blocking." > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Thanks! So, that's the issue. The patch has 161486 characters, way above the limit... Marc, is this an issue for the patch review? I have no idea how to split it in a pretty way. Yours sincerely, Vincent Mailhol