[PATCH 01/26] bpfilter: fix up a sparse annotation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The __user doesn't make sense when casting to an integer type, just
switch to a uintptr_t cast which also removes the need for the __force.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
 net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c b/net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c
index 2c31e82cb953af..3bac5820062af1 100644
--- a/net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c
+++ b/net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int __bpfilter_process_sockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
 	req.is_set = is_set;
 	req.pid = current->pid;
 	req.cmd = optname;
-	req.addr = (long __force __user)optval;
+	req.addr = (uintptr_t)optval;
 	req.len = optlen;
 	if (!bpfilter_ops.info.tgid)
 		goto out;
-- 
2.27.0




[Index of Archives]     [Automotive Discussions]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [CAN Bus]

  Powered by Linux