> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-can-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-can-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > On Behalf Of Joakim Zhang > Sent: 2020年2月14日 17:18 > To: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Pankaj Bansal > <pankaj.bansal@xxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP Flexcan > > > > Best Regards, > Joakim Zhang > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > > Sent: 2020年2月14日 16:43 > > To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Pankaj Bansal > > <pankaj.bansal@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP > > Flexcan > > > > Hi Joakim, > > > > Am 2020-02-14 02:55, schrieb Joakim Zhang: > > > Hi Michal, > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > > >> Sent: 2020年2月14日 3:20 > > >> To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Cc: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@xxxxxxx>; wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > >> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Pankaj Bansal > > >> <pankaj.bansal@xxxxxxx>; Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP > > >> Flexcan > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> >>> Are you prepared to add back these patches as they are > > >> >>> necessary for Flexcan CAN FD? And this Flexcan CAN FD patch set > > >> >>> is based on these patches. > > >> >> > > >> >> Yes, these patches will be added back. > > >> > > > >> >I've cleaned up the first patch a bit, and pushed everything to > > >> >the testing branch. Can you give it a test. > > >> > > >> What happend to that branch? FWIW I've just tried the patches on a > > >> custom board with a LS1028A SoC. Both CAN and CAN-FD are working. > > >> I've tested against a Peaktech USB CAN adapter. I'd love to see > > >> these patches upstream, because our board also offers CAN and basic > > >> support for it just made it upstream [1]. > > > The FlexCAN CAN FD related patches have stayed in > > > linux-can-next/flexcan branch for a long time, I still don't know > > > why Marc doesn't merge them into Linux mainline. > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit. > > > > > > kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fmkl%2Flinux-can-next.g > > > > > > it%2Ftree%2F%3Fh%3Dflexcan&data=02%7C01%7Cqiangqing.zhang%40n > > xp.co > > > > > > m%7C94dca4472a584410b3b908d7b129db27%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c > > 5c30163 > > > > > > 5%7C0%7C0%7C637172665642079192&sdata=77tG6VuQCi%2FZXBKb23 > > 8%2FdNSV3 > > > NUIFrM5Y0e9yj0J3os%3D&reserved=0 > > > Also must hope that this patch set can be upstreamed soon. :-) > > > > I've took them from this branch and applied them to the latest linux master. > > > > Thus, > > > > Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi Marc, How about FlexCAN CAN FD patch set, when will you send to mainline? Thanks a lot! Best Regards, Joakim Zhang
