Hi, >>> Are you prepared to add back these patches as they are necessary for >>> Flexcan CAN FD? And this Flexcan CAN FD patch set is based on these >>> patches. >> >> Yes, these patches will be added back. > >I've cleaned up the first patch a bit, and pushed everything to the >testing branch. Can you give it a test. What happend to that branch? FWIW I've just tried the patches on a custom board with a LS1028A SoC. Both CAN and CAN-FD are working. I've tested against a Peaktech USB CAN adapter. I'd love to see these patches upstream, because our board also offers CAN and basic support for it just made it upstream [1]. If these patches are upstream, only the device tree nodes seems to be missing. I don't know what has happened to [2]. But the patch doesn't seem to be necessary. Pankaj already send a patch to add the device node to the LS1028A [3]. Thats basically the same I've used, only that mine didn't had the "fsl,ls1028ar1-flexcan" compatiblity string, but only the "lx2160ar1-flexcan" which is the correct way to use it, right? Sorry for putting this all in one mail, but I've just subscribed to linux-can and there is no message archive on lore.kernel.org for it :/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200212073617.GA11096@dragon/ [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg01584.html [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg01577.html -michael
