For CANFD 2.0 IP configuration existing driver is using incorrect mask values for FSR register FL and RI fields. Signed-off-by: Appana Durga Kedareswara rao <appana.durga.rao@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c index c9b951b..4cb8c1c9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c @@ -123,8 +123,10 @@ enum xcan_reg { #define XCAN_IDR_RTR_MASK 0x00000001 /* Remote TX request */ #define XCAN_DLCR_DLC_MASK 0xF0000000 /* Data length code */ #define XCAN_FSR_FL_MASK 0x00003F00 /* RX Fill Level */ +#define XCAN_2_FSR_FL_MASK 0x00007F00 /* RX Fill Level */ #define XCAN_FSR_IRI_MASK 0x00000080 /* RX Increment Read Index */ #define XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK 0x0000001F /* RX Read Index */ +#define XCAN_2_FSR_RI_MASK 0x0000003F /* RX Read Index */ #define XCAN_DLCR_EDL_MASK 0x08000000 /* EDL Mask in DLC */ #define XCAN_DLCR_BRS_MASK 0x04000000 /* BRS Mask in DLC */ @@ -1138,7 +1140,7 @@ static int xcan_rx_fifo_get_next_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv) int offset; if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_RX_FIFO_MULTI) { - u32 fsr; + u32 fsr, mask; /* clear RXOK before the is-empty check so that any newly * received frame will reassert it without a race @@ -1148,12 +1150,17 @@ static int xcan_rx_fifo_get_next_frame(struct xcan_priv *priv) fsr = priv->read_reg(priv, XCAN_FSR_OFFSET); /* check if RX FIFO is empty */ - if (!(fsr & XCAN_FSR_FL_MASK)) + if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2) + mask = XCAN_2_FSR_FL_MASK; + else + mask = XCAN_FSR_FL_MASK; + + if (!(fsr & mask)) return -ENOENT; if (priv->devtype.flags & XCAN_FLAG_CANFD_2) offset = - XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(fsr & XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK); + XCAN_RXMSG_2_FRAME_OFFSET(fsr & XCAN_2_FSR_RI_MASK); else offset = XCAN_RXMSG_FRAME_OFFSET(fsr & XCAN_FSR_RI_MASK); -- 2.7.4