Hi , Apologies somehow the reply didnt reach On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:33 PM Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10.10.2018 13:37, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > > hi , > > Hi! > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:18 PM Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Commit 9e5f1b273e6a ("can: xilinx_can: add support for Xilinx CAN FD > >> core") added a new can_bittiming_const structure for CAN FD cores that > >> support larger values for tseg1, tseg2, and sjw than previous Xilinx CAN > >> cores, but the commit did not actually take that into use. > >> > >> Fix that. > >> > >> Tested with CAN FD core on a ZynqMP board. > >> Reviewed-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Fixes: 9e5f1b273e6a ("can: xilinx_can: add support for Xilinx CAN FD core") > >> Reported-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c > >> index 045f0845e665..3df23487487f 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c > >> @@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ static const struct xcan_devtype_data xcan_canfd_data = { > >> XCAN_FLAG_RXMNF | > >> XCAN_FLAG_TX_MAILBOXES | > > sequencial or mailbox is a design choice ? > > What happens if one selects sequencial mode in vivado? > > RX sequential/mailbox is a design choice in Vivado, but TX is not > configurable. > > >> XCAN_FLAG_RX_FIFO_MULTI, > >> - .bittiming_const = &xcan_bittiming_const, > >> + .bittiming_const = &xcan_bittiming_const_canfd, > >> .btr_ts2_shift = XCAN_BTR_TS2_SHIFT_CANFD, > >> .btr_sjw_shift = XCAN_BTR_SJW_SHIFT_CANFD, > >> .bus_clk_name = "s_axi_aclk", > >> -- > >> 2.17.1 > >> > > -- > Anssi Hannula / Bitwise Oy > +358 503803997 >