Hi, On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 4:58 AM, Проклов Александр Валерьевич > <ProklovAV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> Thanks for your work. Since version bluez-5.50 start-stop discovery work >> from command line and scripts: >> #bluetoothctl scan on >> #bluetoothctl scan off >> (see mail-list "Problem with StopDiscovery() via dbus-send") >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> >> My next task is to do pair with device from bash script. I tried several >> ways: >> 1. #bluetoothctl pair 11:22:33:44:55:66 does not work because the agent is >> not created. >> 2. Make agent via Dbus: >> #dbus-send --system --print-reply --type=method_call --dest=org.bluez >> /org/bluez org.bluez.AgentManager1.RegisterAgent objpath:/org/bluez/agent1 >> string:KeyboardOnly >> the command works, but I do not see in Dbus /org/bluez/agent1 created. >> 3. Make agent via bluetoothctl: >> [bluetooth]#agent on >> the command works, but I do not see in Dbus agent path!. > > Im not sure Im following, you would like to have non-interactive mode > working for bluetoothctl pair? The point number 2 don't make much > sense since dbus-send normally disconnected after the reply that means > the agent would be gone, also regarding 3 if you use a more recent > version of bluetootctl it registers and agent automatically nowadays. > >> May be possible to set a default pin code via /etc/bluetooth/main.conf >> if it is available, do not make a request for a pin from the command line? I >> think that then #bluetoothctl pair 11:22:33:44:55:66 will be able to work >> fine. > > That is something I had in mind, lets see if I can come up with something. Actually it doesn't seems to be possible with the current IO capabilities even if I set KeyboardOnly the phone end up displaying the passcode on its end, so it seems there is no combination where the acceptor would be asked to enter a passkey and the initiator to enter it. I wonder if that is on purpose though, because right now the only options in case of headless solution would be to use just works and switch Adapter.Pairable on demand. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz
