Hi David, On Fri, Sep 09, 2011, David Stockwell wrote: > A short cut: the output is a contiguous array of uint_8, so masking > with 0xFF should be unnecessary. Would this be required for non-x86 > (including x86_64) architectures? Firstly, please don't top-post on this mailing list. If you don't do "& 0xff" and the value you're trying to assign to cid[n] is greater than 0xff isn't the result of the integer overflow that follows essentially the same as if you had done "% (0xff + 1)" (which is not what you want in this case). Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
