Hi, On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Bastien Nocera <hadess@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I *obviously* can't split the original patch in 2 patches and keep the > code working. Lizardo wanted the simplification of the name setting and > the adaptername plugin patch to be separate so that we could potentially > bisect regressions. "wanted" is a bit too much IMHO. It was a suggestion based on my own review. In the end it is up to the commiters of the project (Johan & Marcel ?) to decide whether to accept/reject the patches. My suggestion was to simply split between "move adapter naming into a plugin" (like the description of your original patch) and "add support for pretty hostnames from systemd". Currently both things are done in a single patch. Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT Manaus - Brazil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html