On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 03:56:31AM +0200, ext Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> > > On 07/29/2010 09:00 PM, ext Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> > > >From: Gustavo F. Padovan<padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > >If the remote side doesn't support Enhanced Retransmission Mode neither
> > > >Streaming Mode, we shall not send the RFC option.
> > > >Some devices that only supports Basic Mode do not understanding the RFC
> > > >option. This patch fix the regression found with that devices.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes this is better. After some research i found out that quite many
> > > old devices are not handling properly unknown options.
> >
> > Nice, we can put this upstream, do you agree?
> >
> > >
> > > However I found another regression. And this kind of patch is needed
> > > also. Otherwise the info rsp code is reading feat_mask from failed
> > > response (and does invalid memory access).
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> > > index 0f34e12..1e174a4 100644
> > > --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> > > @@ -3348,6 +3348,13 @@ static inline int
> > > l2cap_information_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cm
> > >
> > > del_timer(&conn->info_timer);
> > >
> > > + if (result != L2CAP_IR_SUCCESS) {
> > > + conn->info_state |= L2CAP_INFO_FEAT_MASK_REQ_DONE;
> > > + conn->info_ident = 0;
> > > + l2cap_conn_start(conn);
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (type == L2CAP_IT_FEAT_MASK) {
> > > conn->feat_mask = get_unaligned_le32(rsp->data);
> > >
> >
> > Ack. Send a proper GIT patch then we can push this fix.
>
> am I getting this proper patch or not?
Yes.
--
Ville
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
