On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Having separate methods for feature and output reports should be > > sufficient and general enough, right? > > Most likely, yes. Feature is enough for the 2 devices I provided patches > for. Could you please comment on what you'd like the implementation of > this to look like? I think that we should probably introduce flag parameter into hid_output_raw_report(), which would indicate whether OUTPUT or FEATURE report should be sent. This makes sense both for Bluetooth and HID. I will send out patches later today for you guys to test (and for Marcel to Ack the Bluetooth part). > This simple bug fix is turning into a lot more to-and-fro than I would > have anticipated. It's nice example of evolution, isn't it? :) Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
