> > > I sent a new version of the patch, which uses "HIDP_TRANS_SET_REPORT | > > > HIDP_DATA_RTYPE_FEATURE" for the first byte. Would that work? > > > > Actually for my application it doesn't. I use HIDP_TRANS_DATA | > HIDP_DATA_RTYPE_OUTPUT. > > > > Perhaps allowing the user the choice of what do to here is more flexible. > > Except that it would mean different code for USB and Bluetooth > versions... So do we need a method of setting which device reports we're sending before writing them? Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
