On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Gunn, Brian wrote: > > > > I sent a new version of the patch, which uses "HIDP_TRANS_SET_REPORT | > > > > HIDP_DATA_RTYPE_FEATURE" for the first byte. Would that work? > > > > > > Actually for my application it doesn't. I use HIDP_TRANS_DATA | > > HIDP_DATA_RTYPE_OUTPUT. > > > > > > Perhaps allowing the user the choice of what do to here is more flexible. > > > > Except that it would mean different code for USB and Bluetooth > > versions... > > So do we need a method of setting which device reports we're sending before writing them? Having separate methods for feature and output reports should be sufficient and general enough, right? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
