O.k., Venu:
I'll reverse the order of your suggestions and try getting the HCI trace
for Windows first. As you say, comparing it to the bluez trace will
probably throw more light into the reason for the difference in
performance and will help make clear whether changing the code is the
way to go. I'll post the results later.
Regards,
Daniel
P.S.: Folks, if this discussion is not appropriate for this mailing
list, please let me know and I will continue talking to Venu privately.
Citando venu:
Hi
I work on the bluetooth protocol, but I have not worked on Bluez stack
at all. I have worked/working on existing protocol stack for
semiconductor company. When I look at the HCI Commands log, I donot
see any HCI Command Remote Name request, for getting the remote
features, I see that hci command for reading remote name request being
sent directly to the host. Ours is a PC Solution which has USB Transport.
Even to follow, your suggestion you would need to modify the HID
Profile stack to effect that.
But if you can get HCI Logs for windows for your case and compare it ,
it would throw light what/where the problem could be.
Cheers,
Venu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
