Hi On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There definitely needs to be a way to know that a remote device has > connected to us even if it is not paired. I think we should just > populate the Devices list in this case and then remove the device from > it once it disconnects (if it didn't pair before that) and also send all > appropriate signals while doing this. For knowing if the device is > paired or not we already have the separate Paired property. We could create the device object, but we should be careful to not start a service discovery and end up with this device on the storage. Note that this can be a security problem, since normally connections should at least trigger authorization which requires the object anyway, so someone is not really asking to the agent to authorize a incoming connection. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz Engenheiro de Computação -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
