On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 04:02:26PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:34 -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > More suitable towards a BoF as I don't *think* a larger audience would be > > interested. At the last LSF during our talks about automation it was suggested > > we could share a repo and go to town as we're all adults. That's been done: > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=a83af7a2-f7a1cec7-a83b7ced-000babff32e3-f8d68746f8f1175e&q=1&e=f2f6f708-e4a4-4976-bd4f-5faebd8f572c&u=https*3A*2F*2Fgithub.com*2Flinux-kdevops*2Fkdevops__;JSUlJSU!!EwVzqGoTKBqv-0DWAJBm!Ton7OdUx1HbmbleyTg_Qx_6ZjiVDqNkYaXn6cWoJHlqUeQpwcbBsUot5meY3ylHMj0cnj4kBWKKYM-Yq9ZOLLA$ > > > > At ALPSS folks suggested maybe non-github, best we can do for now is > > gitlab: > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gitlab.com/linux-kdevops/kdevops__;!!EwVzqGoTKBqv-0DWAJBm!Ton7OdUx1HbmbleyTg_Qx_6ZjiVDqNkYaXn6cWoJHlqUeQpwcbBsUot5meY3ylHMj0cnj4kBWKKYM-a0CMLpjQ$ > > > > There's been quite a bit of development from folks on the To list. But > > there's also bugs even on the upstream kernel now that can sometimes erk us. > > One example is 9p is now used to be able to compile Linux on the host > > instead of the guests. Well if you edit a file after boot on the host > > for Linux, the guest won't see the update, so I guess 9p doesn't update > > the guest's copy yet. Guests just have to reboot now. So we have to fix that > > and I guess add 9p to fstests. Or now that we have NFS support thanks to > > Jeff, maybe use that as an option? What's the overhead for automation Vs 9p? > > > > We dicussed sharing more archive of results for fstests/blktests. Done. > > What are the other developer's pain points? What would folks like? If > > folks want demos for complex setups let me know and we can just do that > > through zoom and record them / publish online to help as documentation > > (please reply to this thread in private to me and I can set up a > > session). Let's use the time at LSF more for figuring out what is needed > > for the next year. > > > > Luis > > Luis mentioned that no one had replied to this expressing interest. I'm > definitely interested in discussing kdevops if the schedule's not > already full. +1 for me as well. > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
