On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:34 -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > More suitable towards a BoF as I don't *think* a larger audience would be > interested. At the last LSF during our talks about automation it was suggested > we could share a repo and go to town as we're all adults. That's been done: > > https://github.com/linux-kdevops/kdevops > > At ALPSS folks suggested maybe non-github, best we can do for now is > gitlab: > > https://gitlab.com/linux-kdevops/kdevops > > There's been quite a bit of development from folks on the To list. But > there's also bugs even on the upstream kernel now that can sometimes erk us. > One example is 9p is now used to be able to compile Linux on the host > instead of the guests. Well if you edit a file after boot on the host > for Linux, the guest won't see the update, so I guess 9p doesn't update > the guest's copy yet. Guests just have to reboot now. So we have to fix that > and I guess add 9p to fstests. Or now that we have NFS support thanks to > Jeff, maybe use that as an option? What's the overhead for automation Vs 9p? > > We dicussed sharing more archive of results for fstests/blktests. Done. > What are the other developer's pain points? What would folks like? If > folks want demos for complex setups let me know and we can just do that > through zoom and record them / publish online to help as documentation > (please reply to this thread in private to me and I can set up a > session). Let's use the time at LSF more for figuring out what is needed > for the next year. > > Luis Luis mentioned that no one had replied to this expressing interest. I'm definitely interested in discussing kdevops if the schedule's not already full. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
