Re: [PATCH RFC] block - ataflop.c: fix breakage introduced at blk-mq refactoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/18/21 6:14 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
>>
>> Oh please, can we skip the empty words, this is tiresome and 
>> unproductive. Since you apparently have a much better grasp on this than 
>> I do, answer me this:
>>
>> 1) How many users of ataflop are there?
>>
>> 2) How big of a subset of that group are capable of figuring out where
>>    to send a bug report?
>>
> 
> Both good questions. Here are some more.
> 
> 3) How many users is sufficient to justify the cost of keeping ataflop 
> around?
> 
> 4) How long is the user count allowed to remain below that threshold, 
> before the code is removed?

I'm not interested in bot conversations. EOD.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux