Re: [PATCH RFC] block - ataflop.c: fix breakage introduced at blk-mq refactoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Jens Axboe wrote:

> Was going to ask if this driver was used by anyone, since it's taken 3
> years for the breakage to be spotted... 

A lack of bug reports never implied a lack of users (or potential users). 
That falacy is really getting tiresome.

It is much more difficult to report regressions than it is to use a 
workaround (i.e. boot a known good kernel). And I have plenty of sympathy 
for end-users who may assume that the people and corporations who create 
the breakage will take responsibility for fixing it.

Do maintainers really expect innocent end users to report and bisect 
regressions, and also test a series of potential fixes until one of them 
is finally found to both work and pass code review?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux