On 12/14/18 9:56 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 08:47:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 12/13/18 4:25 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 03:32:18PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:18:40AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Welll ... this is not just 'lsblk', but more importantly this will force
udev to create _block_ device nodes for the hidden devices, essentially
'unhide' them.
Is this what we want?
Christoph?
I thought the entire _point_ of having hidden devices is that the are ...
well ... hidden ...
Yes, that is why I really don't like the last two patches.
And I've checked back - lsblk actually works just fine at the moment.
But it turns out once we create the slave links it stops working,
which is a really good argument against the first two patches, which
would otherwise seem nice..
Which is why I have sent the "paths/" patchset in the first place. Because I
did some homework and read the previous discussion about this, and how lsblk
failure to behave with slave links led to the revert of the slaves/holders
patch by Dr. Hannes.
But you haven't answered my question:
Why can't we patch 'lsblk' to provide the required information even with the
current sysfs layout?
I think we could, but with my Ubuntu hat on, after the kernel fix for
initramfs-tools, that is, slaves/holders links, the user will get an updated
kernel that breaks the current lsblk on Bionic (Ubuntu 18.04). That will
require that we backport the lsblk fix, which is not only more work, but there
may be users who only update from -security, which is where kernel updates end
regularly, but not this lsblk fix.
And that kernel update is a regression against that old lsblk version.
Now you get me confused.
Which kernel update you are referring to?
We do _not_ provide any 'slave' link with the current upstream, so I
somewhat fail to see which breakage you are referring to ...
Confused,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
