On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:18:40AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Welll ... this is not just 'lsblk', but more importantly this will force > udev to create _block_ device nodes for the hidden devices, essentially > 'unhide' them. > > Is this what we want? > Christoph? > I thought the entire _point_ of having hidden devices is that the are ... > well ... hidden ... Yes, that is why I really don't like the last two patches. And I've checked back - lsblk actually works just fine at the moment. But it turns out once we create the slave links it stops working, which is a really good argument against the first two patches, which would otherwise seem nice..
