Re: [PATCH 4/4] block: expose devt for GENHD_FL_HIDDEN disks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/6/18 5:48 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
Without this exposure, lsblk will fail as it tries to find out the
device's dev_t numbers. This causes a real problem for nvme multipath
devices, as their slaves are hidden.

Exposing them fixes the problem, even though trying to open the devices
returns an error in the case of nvme multipath. So, right now, it's the
driver's responsibility to return a failure to open hidden devices.

Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  block/genhd.c | 9 ++++-----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index 7674fce32fca..65a7fa664188 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static void __device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
disk_alloc_events(disk); + disk_to_dev(disk)->devt = devt;
  	if (disk->flags & GENHD_FL_HIDDEN) {
  		/*
  		 * Don't let hidden disks show up in /proc/partitions,
@@ -698,13 +699,12 @@ static void __device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
  		int ret;
/* Register BDI before referencing it from bdev */
-		disk_to_dev(disk)->devt = devt;
  		ret = bdi_register_owner(disk->queue->backing_dev_info,
  						disk_to_dev(disk));
  		WARN_ON(ret);
-		blk_register_region(disk_devt(disk), disk->minors, NULL,
-				    exact_match, exact_lock, disk);
  	}
+	blk_register_region(disk_devt(disk), disk->minors, NULL,
+			    exact_match, exact_lock, disk);
  	register_disk(parent, disk, groups);
  	if (register_queue)
  		blk_register_queue(disk);
@@ -776,8 +776,7 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
  		WARN_ON(1);
  	}
- if (!(disk->flags & GENHD_FL_HIDDEN))
-		blk_unregister_region(disk_devt(disk), disk->minors);
+	blk_unregister_region(disk_devt(disk), disk->minors);
kobject_put(disk->part0.holder_dir);
  	kobject_put(disk->slave_dir);

Welll ... this is not just 'lsblk', but more importantly this will force udev to create _block_ device nodes for the hidden devices, essentially 'unhide' them.

Is this what we want?
Christoph?
I thought the entire _point_ of having hidden devices is that the are ... well ... hidden ...

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux