) Am 28.11.2017 um 20:51 schrieb Michael Lyle: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> nobody asked for this - but bcache provides bcache-tools and upstream >> udev rules and those don't work in this case. To i consider this an >> upstream bug. Not a bug in my envorinment or in my distribution. > > I do not maintain bcache-tools. It looks like g2p wrote a set of > rules in 2014 that Debian uses. Gentoo uses a different set of rules. > Arch uses a slightly different set of rules. > > Nor is what you're trying to do completely safe, because depending on > rule ordering it can mean if you stack md & bcache, for instance, very > bad things could happen with your change. Thanks - that helped. - didn't know that the original bcache-tools which came from kent were handed over to somebody else / or that each distribution uses it's own. > This is an issue for your distribution maintainer. > >> >> I can fix this myself - i just had the hope to get it fixed upstream so >> others don't fall into the same issue. >> >> Greets, >> Stefan > > Mike > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
