Re: bcache_gc: BUG: soft lockup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

After several weeks using the 4.2.6 kernel + patches from Ewheeler we just ran into a crash again.
This time the kernel was still running and the server was responsive but not able to do any IO on the bcache devices.

[696983.683498] bcache_writebac D ffffffff810643df     0  5741      2 0x00000000
[696983.683505]  ffff88103d01f180 0000000000000046 ffff88107842d000 ffffffff811a95cd
[696983.683510]  0000000000000000 ffff8810388c4000 ffff88103d01f180 0000000000000001
[696983.683514]  ffff882034ae0c10 0000000000000000 ffff882034ae0000 ffffffff8139601e
[696983.683518] Call Trace:
[696983.683530]  [<ffffffff811a95cd>] ? blk_queue_bio+0x262/0x279
[696983.683539]  [<ffffffff8139601e>] ? schedule+0x6b/0x78
[696983.683553]  [<ffffffffa032ce9b>] ? closure_sync+0x66/0x91 [bcache]
[696983.683563]  [<ffffffffa033c89f>] ? bch_writeback_thread+0x622/0x6b5 [bcache]
[696983.683569]  [<ffffffff8100265c>] ? __switch_to+0x1de/0x3f7
[696983.683578]  [<ffffffffa033c89f>] ? bch_writeback_thread+0x622/0x6b5 [bcache]
[696983.683586]  [<ffffffffa033c27d>] ? write_dirty_finish+0x1bf/0x1bf [bcache]
[696983.683594]  [<ffffffff810589d6>] ? kthread+0x99/0xa1
[696983.683598]  [<ffffffff8105893d>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16
[696983.683603]  [<ffffffff813986df>] ? ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
[696983.683607]  [<ffffffff8105893d>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16

Don't know if this help.
Unfortunately I thing that we will rollback and stop using Bcache unless this is really fixed :/

Regards,

7 décembre 2015 11:35 "Yannis Aribaud" <bugs@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> It's been one week I'm using a 4.2.6 kernel merged with the Bcache patches from Ewheeler and no
> signs of any kind of trouble I had before.
> Thus it seems your patches fix my soft lockup issue.
> It's currently running on one of my ceph nodes, I will certainly push it on the others during the
> next weeks.
> 
> It would be great to merge thoses patches upstream since it seems that using Bcache in production
> requires those fixes.
> 
> Anyway, thanks to all of you for your time, advices and work on Bcache. I'll keep you updated.
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Open is better
-- 
Open is better
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux