Re: Is bcache dead?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 02:55:03PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/30/2014 09:14 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
no, I've just been severely overworked, and overstressed, to the point
that it might be time for a change of jobs - and unfortunately, there
still isn't anyone else who can step in. It's not fun being the single
point of failure.
Don't sweat it Kent.  Don't get discouraged.  Stay positive.

I tried bcache a few weeks ago for a pretty niche application and it
wasn't suitable for that workload for what I wanted it to do.  I asked
questions here to make it work but got no responses.  Would have been a
feather in your cap to had bcache on those systems--two 44TiB LUNs on
the small ones, 14x 44TiB LUNs on the large one--if it could have been
made to work with that workload.  We'll probably fix it by modifying the
app to do full stripe buffer writes.  Yes, this is much more work than
simply slapping in bcache, had it worked.  I was looking for a quick fix.

I know the demands from myself and others can create stress.  But when
you feel stressed by it, remember that the demand is a direct result of
you creating something special, that people really want to use.

You recognize and acknowledge the fact that you're a one man show right
now.  Your users know it too.  Do what you can when you can, and do it
right.  I think most people will be more forgiving of delays than
mistakes, or broken promises, or silence.  Communication helps.  If
you're bogged down, just post a quick note the list letting everyone
know.  A quick update like that goes a long way, whereas silence breeds
discontent among users, because they don't know what's going on.

Keep your chin up.  You'll get there, even if it takes longer than folks
would like.

Best regards,

Stan
Thanks, I really do appreciate the kind words.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

If I can throw mine in as well, I've been running bcache on my Debian Wheezy laptop for around a year now. (I'm using the Debian backports 3.12 kernel.) When I first moved to bcache, I noticed that certain operations -- interacting with Git repositories and building LaTeX documents, for instance -- became much snappier. I'm using a feeble little 32GB SSD that came with the laptop to cache a 1TB drive and I'm even using writethrough caching (more out of paranoia about the quality of my cheap little SSD than anything else), but it makes a difference.

Since then, it has been quietly humming along and I've stopped paying attention to it. And that's the beauty of a good tool like this: I can stop paying attention to it. I've enjoyed a year of better I/O and, other than in the initial setup, I haven't paid anything in maintenance burden: no instability, no hiccups, no unexplained hangs. So for my part as an end user just trying to get a little edge out of my laptop hardware, thank you! I expect I'm speaking on behalf of quite a few people when I say that you've made things better in a subtle but significant way. :)

Cheers,

Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux