RE: Another bcache hang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: David H. Rhodes Clymer [mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 7:49 PM
>
> Laziness, mostly. The RAID1 array is a PV that houses filesystems we'd
> rather thot lose. The development databases are not so critical - we
> rebuild them at least once a week anyway. The use of LVs was a quick
> and easy way to test various caching implementations without increasing
> the risk of data loss or corruption in the rest of the system.

Ah, okay, I get it; you had a pre-existing PV with production stuff on it
you didn't want to lose and were just testing out bcache, makes sense.

I haven't seen any responses to your hang report though :(, while obviously
there's no expectation of support, it's always nice if you're going to drop
something into production to have a forum where the experts give you a hand
when things blow chunks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux