Hello Fons. On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 20:14:14 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote : > And as a final topping on the cake, that whole crappy thing is > presented as if I were the author of it all. No mention at all > that things have been modified, and by whom or why. This alone > is a clear violation of the license under which zita-at1 was > released. And whoever did it doesn't even have the courage to > identify him/herself. > > I've complained about this sort of thing before, and this time > I'm really pissed. So let one thing be clear: I will never again > release any code under a license that allows this sort of thing > to happen. Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:41:38 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > however, as philipp noted, i think that i have never seen any open > source license that would prohibit what happened here. it would be a > great shame if fons' immense contributions to audio software, and > linux audio software in particular, ended up being released under > closed source licenses in the future. On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 03:22:41 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote : > I really don't know how releasing the code under a different license > could possibly get rid of this issue. If people violate the GPL they > will violate any other license as well and there's little you can do > about it. The only way that might work is to not release any code at > all, and I hope that you won't go down that road. On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:30:58 +0200, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote: > You must not ever release any source code to anyone then. Cause this > kind of thing is bound to happen. People will ignore licenses. People > will butcher code. On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:48:35 +0200, Joakim Hernberg wrote : > Seems completely unacceptable to modify GPL code without clearly > stating who has done the modification and just leave the old > information in place making it appear as it is the work of the > original author. Using the zita moniker in the name of the program > just serves to confuse the situation ever more. The GPL is not in cause; a binary released with a non-free license could also have attribution issues. On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:09:10 -0500, Chris Caudle wrote : > http://sourceforge.net/u/j-e-f-f-g/profile/send_message On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:18:42 +0100, Will Godfrey wrote : > Seems it's already been removed. Looking carefully at : http://sourceforge.net/u/j-e-f-f-g/profile/ nothing appeared to be released. But a Google search for zitaretuner shows some previous activity on SourceForge. I can see: "zitaretuner. LV2 and LADSPA versions of Fons Adriaensen's pitch retuner. Brought to you by: j-e-f-f-g" It looks like the software was attributed to j-e-f-f-g, as a version of retuner by Fons Adriaensen. Is there a link to the current release? How can we get the software? -- Marc _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
