On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 19:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 17:42 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:33:58PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > If jackd is started with settings that cause another latency, than the > > > latency that was used, when an audio recording was done with Qtractor, > > > then audio and MIDI tracks get out of sync. So jackd has to be started > > > with the same latency. If the session manager shouldn't start jackd, the > > > latency settings could be incorrect. > > > > And that is a design error in Qtractor and has *nothing* to do with NSM. > > If latency compensation is implemented correctly (which is easy) there > > no need to remember any latency values in the session file. Which implies > > that a change of latency doesn't matter, see also my previous post. > > > > So please stop whining about this. > > You got me wrong! I only pointed out that "NSM (Non session management) > support." - http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html Could > cause issues, for those who understand it word by word. And who aren't > aware that "An Audio/MIDI multi-track sequencer" - > http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html has to be understand > word by word. Audio tracks are just a bonus that isn't part of the > complete concept. > > I never claimed that NSM is bad, I just pointed out that Qtractor offers > features that aren't restored, by this session manager. Users should be > warned! I don't need a warning, I'm using scripts! I don't lamment! I > just want to help, that users once will be upset, because they ^ not ;) > misunderstood Qtractors NSM support. > > Ok? > > Regards, > Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
