On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 22:19 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:15:25PM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > > > qtractor does try to adjust the so called logical position or start > > offset by Li as Fons explained; the Li (input latency) value is the > > one given by jack_port_get_latency_range() at the time > > capture/recording takes place; the actual offset is however > > quantized/rounded to MIDI resolution (in ticks per quarter-note or > > beat)--this fact alone might add to its "strangeness" i guess. > > Why do that ? There's really no reason for it. Qtractor has got two weak points, audio tracks and the mixer, regarding to MIDI usability it IMO is the most satisfying Linux FLOSS sequencer. The sequencer has it's weak points too, „Form follows function“, e.g. I don't want to use mixer automation to mute and un-mute MIDI clips. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
