On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:32:39PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > loading a snapshot and then saving will alter the state of the > snapshot that was loaded, not the "current session" or any other > snapshot. That exactly is the problem. I would expect things to work as you decribe when a 'save as' file is reloaded, and that is also what happens of course. But I wouldn't expect a snapshot to be modified by a normal 'save' but only when the user explicitly asks for it, by using 'new snapshot' with the same name (which would have to be typed in manually). Overwriting snapshots to me feels like rewriting history, or bypassing a version control system. The root of the problem is that files created by 'new snapshot' and 'save as' are identical, and both are treated as 'session files' when reloaded. But the user's intention behind creating either of them is likely to be different. That intention is handled correctly when the files are created (a snapshot won't be modified by later changes), but not when they are reloaded. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user