On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:58:07 +0100, Arnold Krille <arnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote : > Am Sun, 26 Jan 2014 19:40:07 -0500 > schrieb "jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:18:29 -0500, > > Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote : > > > sometimes, i envy applications that use encoded, proprietary > > > session file formats :) > > > > Yes, I wish users could not modify Perl programs that are given to > > them. > Oh, there is an easy way to write perl programs that users can't > modify: Just write perl code with a language-conform level of > obscurity (that is normal perl code)! :-P >From experience with many developers, I can say that stupid things can be done in any language. Things can also seem to be cleraly written, but not thought out that much. People with Perl tend to be in two groups: the 'script' one which ranks close to the bottom of the barrel, still relating to 5.0 issues of perhaps 20 years ago, not using 'warning' and 'strict' and such, and the 'program' one that uses proven multi-tasking frameworks, contemporary object-orientation, and such, which of course also tend to care more about design and programming than the former group. The first group is into 'Using Perl' and in 'Using C++' or how to use a hammer, while the second group is caring more about the hosue to build than using the hammer (ツ) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
