On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 10:47 +0300, Dan Muresan wrote: > As I said, when providing a **summary**, i.e. a text that people can > read without interruption to make up their minds, please provide the > quotations **in-text**, with full context (and, yes, perhaps with > URLs). Do not provide in-text quotations selectively. You've included > selected quotations in-text to support your points, while only > alluding to other quotations without posting them. > > No, obvious reference links do not help. > > You're already making a case that few people will support. You might > as least quote fairly instead of selectively, even if you put your > spin on the whole exchange. > > On 9/21/13, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 10:26 +0300, Dan Muresan wrote: > >> If you provide a summary (even with your spin on it) please provide > >> full quotes for everything you refer to. In particular provide the > >> context for the "simple-minded" quote. Don't provide context only > >> selectively. > > > > My apologies, good that I still did read the mails regarding to this > > thread. I don't like to continue the discussion, but I will correct my > > mistake. > > > > The full quote is here: > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2013-September/034216.html ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ This is the text: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus) Fons Adriaensen fons at linuxaudio.org Fri Sep 20 20:24:12 UTC 2013 Previous message: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus) Next message: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus) Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:04:57PM +0200, Felix Homann wrote: > Am 20.09.2013 21:56 schrieb "Fons Adriaensen" <fons at linuxaudio.org>: > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:52:06PM +0200, Felix Homann wrote: > > > > > Would you mind Maurizio Gavioli to play around with your code in > private? > > > > No. > > > > > don't think so. So why do you mind him sharing his 'playground'? > > > > Why do you think I should feel the same about both ? > > > > Because of the things I have written and you didn't comment on :-) You mean this: > You might argue that he better not published his toying around. But then > again you possibly forced him to do so: Just imagine he gave a binary to > someone. Then by the license *you* have chosen for your code *he* is > *obliged* to share his code - no matter how good or worth publishing it is. I did not force him to anything. Giving a binary to anyone is *his* decision, not mine. And all that the original license obliges him to do in that case is to give the sources the same person. > A 'fork' on github is a convenient way to comply with GPL licenses. 'Convenient' is the key word here. Some people only think of what's 'convenient' to them, everything else is too much for their simple minds. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) > > > > The context still is the context, is the context, is the context and I > > guess that people followed the thread. Sorry again! > > > > All shorten quotes IMO were not shamming another content, but I might be > > wrong. All quotes in full length can be found in those archives: > > > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/ > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/ > > > > and on github > > > > https://github.com/mgavioli/oscAeolus/issues/1 > > > > Regards, > > Ralf > > > > > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
