As I said, when providing a **summary**, i.e. a text that people can read without interruption to make up their minds, please provide the quotations **in-text**, with full context (and, yes, perhaps with URLs). Do not provide in-text quotations selectively. You've included selected quotations in-text to support your points, while only alluding to other quotations without posting them. No, obvious reference links do not help. You're already making a case that few people will support. You might as least quote fairly instead of selectively, even if you put your spin on the whole exchange. On 9/21/13, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 10:26 +0300, Dan Muresan wrote: >> If you provide a summary (even with your spin on it) please provide >> full quotes for everything you refer to. In particular provide the >> context for the "simple-minded" quote. Don't provide context only >> selectively. > > My apologies, good that I still did read the mails regarding to this > thread. I don't like to continue the discussion, but I will correct my > mistake. > > The full quote is here: > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2013-September/034216.html > > The context still is the context, is the context, is the context and I > guess that people followed the thread. Sorry again! > > All shorten quotes IMO were not shamming another content, but I might be > wrong. All quotes in full length can be found in those archives: > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/ > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/ > > and on github > > https://github.com/mgavioli/oscAeolus/issues/1 > > Regards, > Ralf > > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user