On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:25:31 +0000 Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 07:50:44PM -0400, Marc Lavallée wrote: > > > I'm sure it's been answered many times, but here's my question: > > For loudness evaluation, how's EBU R128 "better" than ReplayGain? > > (Or why use EBU R128 instead of ReplayGain?) > > (A link to the suitable InterWeb resource would be appropriate) > > http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=ReplayGain_1.0_specification > http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=ReplayGain_2.0_specification > > The proposed RG2 spec uses the same algorithm as R-128. > > Ciao, > One of the first things I thought when I saw the R-128 talk was" Could this be used for a better replaygain?". Very nice to see that such an effort is underway. Now the obvious question is: Will this work better than the old replay gain, and by how much? Has anyone done tests? Regards, Philipp _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
