Re: Gain and clipping wav -> lame

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 07:50:44PM -0400, Marc Lavallée wrote:
 
> I'm sure it's been answered many times, but here's my question:
> For loudness evaluation, how's EBU R128 "better" than ReplayGain?
> (Or why use EBU R128 instead of ReplayGain?)
> (A link to the suitable InterWeb resource would be appropriate)

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=ReplayGain_1.0_specification
http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=ReplayGain_2.0_specification

The proposed RG2 spec uses the same algorithm as R-128.

Ciao,

-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux