Louigi - I didn't take it any other way, really.
I just thought that it was funny and interesting that the entirely legitimate point about how one (open source) DAW doesn't support one (open source) plugin API is mirrored by at least one almost identical example in the proprietary non-linux world.
I just thought that it was funny and interesting that the entirely legitimate point about how one (open source) DAW doesn't support one (open source) plugin API is mirrored by at least one almost identical example in the proprietary non-linux world.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sure, Paul, my comment on Ardour was not meant to say that you should support DSSI. It simply pointed out the facts.
I feel great respect towards developers of Linux Audio and I totally understand that each developer has his reasons for doing what he does. So I was not even asking "why Ardour doesn't support DSSI", I just said that it doesn't. Obviously, you have good reasons for what you are doing.
So, I hope my tone did not turn out as demanding as it was not meant to be at all.You made an interesting point about Windows that people just work with what they have when on Linux devs spend lots of time fixing things. I wonder how big is this effect. Do many people engage in this kind of activity?
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
