Re: RME Multiface and an extra 8 output channels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Way too expensive. There are 32ch converters on the market for a quarter
of that price."

But man, does it sound amazing!  I've currently got one ADI8-QS and as soon as I can afford it, I'll be getting another.  Expensive, but yummy!

--Jason
www.artcitysound.com

On May 15, 2013 1:12 PM, "Florian Faber" <faber@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Joern,

> if you really do, e.g. for creating ultrasonics,

Running at 192 or 96 kHz gives the theoretical bandwidth, yes, but they
are *audio* converters. There are not many chips that convert the
theoretically possible bandwidth. The M16 e.g. does only 50kHz at 192kHz
and 34kHz at 96kHz.

I once had a couple of very disappointed bat biologists who wanted to
use the M32AD :)

> then the only solution
> that comes to mind is an rme hdspm plus a pricey converter for 96 or
> even 192 khz, such as two adi-qs or an m16.

Way too expensive. There are 32ch converters on the market for a quarter
of that price.


Flo
--
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key B3B9226C
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux