"Way too expensive. There are 32ch converters on the market for a quarter
of that price."
But man, does it sound amazing! I've currently got one ADI8-QS and as soon as I can afford it, I'll be getting another. Expensive, but yummy!
--Jason
www.artcitysound.com
On May 15, 2013 1:12 PM, "Florian Faber" <faber@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Joern,
> if you really do, e.g. for creating ultrasonics,
Running at 192 or 96 kHz gives the theoretical bandwidth, yes, but they
are *audio* converters. There are not many chips that convert the
theoretically possible bandwidth. The M16 e.g. does only 50kHz at 192kHz
and 34kHz at 96kHz.
I once had a couple of very disappointed bat biologists who wanted to
use the M32AD :)
> then the only solution
> that comes to mind is an rme hdspm plus a pricey converter for 96 or
> even 192 khz, such as two adi-qs or an m16.
Way too expensive. There are 32ch converters on the market for a quarter
of that price.
Flo
--
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key B3B9226C
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
