Joern, > if you really do, e.g. for creating ultrasonics, Running at 192 or 96 kHz gives the theoretical bandwidth, yes, but they are *audio* converters. There are not many chips that convert the theoretically possible bandwidth. The M16 e.g. does only 50kHz at 192kHz and 34kHz at 96kHz. I once had a couple of very disappointed bat biologists who wanted to use the M32AD :) > then the only solution > that comes to mind is an rme hdspm plus a pricey converter for 96 or > even 192 khz, such as two adi-qs or an m16. Way too expensive. There are 32ch converters on the market for a quarter of that price. Flo -- Machines can do the work, so people have time to think. public key B3B9226C _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
