On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 21:04 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > iain, are you absolutely sure you need sample rates above 48k? i'd be > curious to hear more about your usecase. > > if you really do, e.g. for creating ultrasonics, then the only solution > that comes to mind is an rme hdspm plus a pricey converter for 96 or > even 192 khz, such as two adi-qs or an m16. Perhaps the noise floor at higher sample rates could be an issue for the OP. Sometimes higher sample rates allow to use a lower latency, for my RME card, another model, not the MF, it's not like that, if I set it to higher sample rates, the frames/period automagically becomes higher too. IMO 48 KHz is high enough, not only for my home studio, also for professional usage. FWIW, since my card still is within the warranty period I'm testing if everything does work on a Windows I installed to do the tests. I noticed that for sample rates from 32 KHz to 96 KHz nothing connected to the analog inputs of the card, the noise floor shown by TotalMix is at -110 [1] and for sample rates from 128 KHz to 192 KHz it's at -54. If I connect an elCheapo no-name device, the noise floor for sample rates from 32 KHz to 96 KHz does raise to -87. Even if I would use sample rates higher than 48 KHz, it would be ok for my taste, but it's not what you want for professional usage. A Yamaha MT 44D, a 4-Track cassette recorder already has a better SNR [2]. [1] From the user manual: "(SNR): 113 dB RMS unweighted, 116 dBA @ 44.1 KHz", no information about the SNR for other sample rates. [2] From the service manual: "Signal-to-Noise Ratio (EIAJ) (Dolby OFF) 55 dB", "(Dolby C ON) 67 dB". So at least the card I'm using has got a noise floor for sample rates > 96 KHz, that perhaps isn't ok for the OPs needs. Perhaps it's not like that for more expensive RME cards. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
