On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 06:10 -0300, Iain Mott wrote: > Hi Flo, > > This is what was said: > > "The MF-I and MF-II's AD/DA conversion latencies vary slightly (MF-II is > slightly quicker) - you won't get "Sample accurate" I/O across MF-I to > MF-II" But Flo does get sample accuracy :D or was he floing?! > You mention the multiface 2 is faster too. Will there be a > problem-causing delay between the multiface 1 and 2 channels, a > difference in sound quality, or both? Is there no dealer near to you, who enables testing? For my RME to ADAT sync by ADAT, not WC, is audible, if I use one IO from the RME and the other from the ADA8000. I wouldn't use it that way, but I guess sync between the MFs could be much better. Somebody from RME would use such a combination (RME AIO + ADA8000 one IO from each device), since it's still like moving a microphone a little bit. Tastes differ! > What would be your suggestion for 16 outs on linux? > > I'm not necessarily limited to expanding upon the Multiface/HDSP that I > already have for this project, although saving money is certainly a good > thing! > > Thanks, > > Iain > > Em Ter, 2013-05-14 às 06:34 +0200, Florian Faber escreveu: > > The Multiface 1 and 2 have different converters. Depending on what you > > want to achieve, this is probably not what you want (the converters in > > the Multiface 2 are faster). > > > > What do you mean with "the sync wouldn't be sample-accurate"? Multiple > > cards can be started and stopped at exactly the same buffer position. > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
