Hi Flo, This is what was said: "The MF-I and MF-II's AD/DA conversion latencies vary slightly (MF-II is slightly quicker) - you won't get "Sample accurate" I/O across MF-I to MF-II" You mention the multiface 2 is faster too. Will there be a problem-causing delay between the multiface 1 and 2 channels, a difference in sound quality, or both? What would be your suggestion for 16 outs on linux? I'm not necessarily limited to expanding upon the Multiface/HDSP that I already have for this project, although saving money is certainly a good thing! Thanks, Iain Em Ter, 2013-05-14 às 06:34 +0200, Florian Faber escreveu: > The Multiface 1 and 2 have different converters. Depending on what you > want to achieve, this is probably not what you want (the converters in > the Multiface 2 are faster). > > What do you mean with "the sync wouldn't be sample-accurate"? Multiple > cards can be started and stopped at exactly the same buffer position. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
