Re: What is the best MP3 encoder?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting "Jostein Chr. Andersen" <jostein@xxxxxxx>:

On 03/29/2013 08:27 AM, Leigh Dyer wrote:
On 29/03/13 3:05 AM, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:

In fact, I'd honestly be surprised if you really are hearing a
difference, or hearing the differences you think you're hearing. Doing a
proper ABX test, using a tool like Squishyball, could be very
instructive here --

Never underestimate other peoples ears. This subtle differences are IE.
often the thing that makes esses annoying or not and I have sometimes
recived  negative feedback about it. Mixing is often to be near the
borders and it's easy to do it wrong.

Over at HydrogenAudio they have a rule that you aren't allowed to talk about hearing differences between audio files unless you can prove it in an ABX test. You really should try doing one and check if you *really* can hear the difference between the original wav and an mp3 produced by, say, "lame -V4" ( which would be ~160kbps) or if it's just your mind fooling you into thinking you can. Never underestimate the power of belief :)

If you really can I'm sure the people over at HydrogenAudio and others would love to have you helping out in testing new releases of lame and other encoders.

 - Peder
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux